Refer an AI incident for independent audit
Decision owner: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
AIR / PUBLIC SERVICE NETWORK
AI & Autonomous Systems Authority: public intake, evidence routes and competent specialist services.
Office output: Model assessment
Decision owner: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
Decision owner: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
Decision owner: Public Media & Civic Information Commission
Decision owner: Archives, Libraries & Memory Commission
Decision owner: Justice & Legal Cooperation Commission
Decision owner: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
Decision owner: Public Media & Civic Information Commission
Decision owner: Archives, Libraries & Memory Commission
Decision owner: Justice & Legal Cooperation Commission
Decision owner: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
Decision owner: Public Media & Civic Information Commission
Decision owner: Archives, Libraries & Memory Commission
Decision owner: Justice & Legal Cooperation Commission
Decision owner: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
Decision owner: Public Media & Civic Information Commission
Decision owner: Archives, Libraries & Memory Commission
Decision owner: Justice & Legal Cooperation Commission
Model purpose, affected decisions, training provenance and independent test evidence
A habitat utility uses a model to prioritise reserve access. A resident challenges an exclusion. The Authority reviews the specific deployment and impact, while the operator preserves essential continuity and a human decision-maker reassesses the case. A favourable laboratory benchmark alone cannot justify the disputed public restriction
Competent service: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
Competent service: AI & Autonomous Systems Authority
AI & Autonomous Systems Authority receiving secretariat
Contact about annual service plan; public decisions; performance and expenditure report. →