From request to review
Identify the competent review route
For request independent ai review, record the requester, location, scope and responsible receiving office. The receipt identifies the clock and competent jurisdiction.
Gate: Location and competence are recorded
Owner: Appeal pathwaysPreserve the original record
Assess system documentation; reconcile it with decision or failure evidence and affected-person statement. A missing document has an explicit alternative-evidence route rather than silent rejection.
Gate: Evidence is complete or an alternative is agreed
Owner: AI & Autonomous Systems AuthorityNotify parties with appropriate confidentiality
Ask Data Rights Authority for the finding within its own powers. The consultation records the specific unresolved question, evidence version and requested response.
Gate: A specialist finding is recorded
Owner: Data Rights AuthorityObtain an independent finding
A human review route must remain available for consequential decisions Publish or privately communicate the resolution, including dissent and consent limits.
Gate: The stated safeguard is resolved
Owner: Standards, Time & Measurement AuthorityCommunicate reasons and remedies
An assurance assessment, corrective condition or appeal referral. The decision also names the accountable official role, effective event, conditions, review office and follow-up duties.
Gate: Reasons, conditions and review route are available
Owner: AI & Autonomous Systems AuthorityReview the finding and preserve access
Preserve the source record, decision reasons and conditions for request independent ai review. A service complaint routes to the Ombudsman; a contested legal restriction routes to the Union Court.
Gate: Follow-up owner and record custody are named
Owner: Union Ombudsman
Exceptions and alternate routes
Required evidence is unavailable
Record the missing item and propose a witness, existing register reference or independently verified substitute. The completeness review remains open.
Interplanetary communication is interrupted
Record local receipt time and the delegated action available. Preserve a mirrored log for later reconciliation; do not invent a remote approval.
An adverse finding affects the requester
Provide the finding, allow a response, disclose the review route and preserve essential service continuity where applicable.
Institutional interfaces
Protects privacy and supervises lawful processing of personal information.
Independently evaluates decisions with consequences for human dignity and future populations.
Maintains common reference systems so institutions and equipment can work together.
Start the record
Prepare a requestThe assessment behind the stage diagram
Reviewers examine evidence provenance, human authority, limitations, incident history and affected-person access to remedy. Personal data rights remain independently supervised.
The model version, decision purpose and actual impact define the complaint or assessment. Generic benchmark performance does not settle the rights question.
Possible decisions and what follows
A bounded assessment, corrective deployment condition, incident inquiry or reasoned negative finding.
Version or purpose changes reopen the scope. Retain the human review record and remedy for affected decisions.
Duties after the finding
Keep the scope accurate
Tell the receiving office about a material change in location, activity, operator, record custodian or requested result. The original receipt remains in the history.
Respect source custody
Provide purpose-specific references and authorised representations. Personal, clinical, commercial and protected scientific records have different access scopes.
Respond to a qualified finding
Read the conditions and the institution that owns them. A request for further evidence identifies the specific unresolved issue and the route for an alternative.
Preserve the follow-up
Version or purpose changes reopen the scope. Retain the human review record and remedy for affected decisions.
Disagreement, assistance and evidence alternatives
A completeness query names the unresolved evidence and the alternative the receiving office can assess. An administrative complaint concerns service handling; a legal appeal concerns a finding and its competent remedy. A public petition asks a representative institution to examine a wider issue.