From request to review
Confirm each institution's competence
For refer a workplace safety dispute, record the requester, location, scope and responsible receiving office. The receipt identifies the clock and competent jurisdiction.
Gate: Location and competence are recorded
Owner: Labor & Livelihoods CommissionPrepare the receiving evidence package
Assess inspection finding; reconcile it with worker protection and operator response. A missing document has an explicit alternative-evidence route rather than silent rejection.
Gate: Evidence is complete or an alternative is agreed
Owner: Labor & Livelihoods CommissionAgree responsibilities at the handoff
Ask Civil Safety & Investigations Agency for the finding within its own powers. The consultation records the specific unresolved question, evidence version and requested response.
Gate: A specialist finding is recorded
Owner: Civil Safety & Investigations AgencyResolve conflicts and protected duties
Both the requesting and receiving offices record the scope of the handoff. A referral does not transfer legislative competence. Publish or privately communicate the resolution, including dissent and consent limits.
Gate: The stated safeguard is resolved
Owner: Justice & Legal Cooperation CommissionCountersign a bounded cooperation record
A protected referral with a named competent review body. The decision also names the accountable official role, effective event, conditions, review office and follow-up duties.
Gate: Reasons, conditions and review route are available
Owner: Labor & Livelihoods CommissionReconcile decisions and audit the handoff
Preserve the source record, decision reasons and conditions for refer a workplace safety dispute. A service complaint routes to the Ombudsman; a contested legal restriction routes to the Union Court.
Gate: Follow-up owner and record custody are named
Owner: Union Ombudsman
Exceptions and alternate routes
Required evidence is unavailable
Record the missing item and propose a witness, existing register reference or independently verified substitute. The completeness review remains open.
Interplanetary communication is interrupted
Record local receipt time and the delegated action available. Preserve a mirrored log for later reconciliation; do not invent a remote approval.
An adverse finding affects the requester
Provide the finding, allow a response, disclose the review route and preserve essential service continuity where applicable.
Institutional interfaces
Start the record
Prepare a requestThe assessment behind the stage diagram
The two offices agree the receiving event, accountable roles, disagreement route, local clock convention and reconciliation duty. A handoff is accepted explicitly; silence or a delayed message is not a transfer of powers.
The requesting body supplies its competent powers, the source evidence and the exact decision or capacity sought from the receiving institution. It identifies what remains reserved to each side.
Possible decisions and what follows
A countersigned bounded handoff, a qualified acceptance with scope limits, a request for further evidence or a reasoned refusal by the receiving body.
Both sides preserve the original evidence version and accepted scope. Changes, expiry, reconciliation and unresolved disagreements remain visible in the joint record.
Duties after the finding
Keep the scope accurate
Tell the receiving office about a material change in location, activity, operator, record custodian or requested result. The original receipt remains in the history.
Respect source custody
Provide purpose-specific references and authorised representations. Personal, clinical, commercial and protected scientific records have different access scopes.
Respond to a qualified finding
Read the conditions and the institution that owns them. A request for further evidence identifies the specific unresolved issue and the route for an alternative.
Preserve the follow-up
Both sides preserve the original evidence version and accepted scope. Changes, expiry, reconciliation and unresolved disagreements remain visible in the joint record.
Disagreement, assistance and evidence alternatives
A completeness query names the unresolved evidence and the alternative the receiving office can assess. An administrative complaint concerns service handling; a legal appeal concerns a finding and its competent remedy. A public petition asks a representative institution to examine a wider issue.