Solar System Union supplied sealThe Solar System UnionPublic institutions
Shared rights across worlds
Court of Public Audit identity
AUD / oversight
Court of Public Audit

AUD / PUBLIC SERVICE NETWORK

Challenge misuse of public funds

An independent audit referral and protected reporting route.

AUDoversightUnion-wide competence

What this procedure decides

Challenge suspected misuse of common funds through an independent audit route.

Auditors separate allegation, verified evidence, expenditure finding and competent legal referral. The audited body responds without controlling the source record.

Acting in the right capacity

People and households

Residents, passengers, workers, learners, caregivers and authorised advocates. State whether you act for yourself, a dependant or a person who authorised your representation. Keep household and care records within the request’s actual purpose.

Public administrations

Local councils, regional offices, Union bodies and authorised public-service delegates. Name the originating power, receiving scope, authorised delegate, reserved decisions and the event at which the other office accepts a duty.

Prepare assessable evidence

  1. Public contract or payment reference

    Identify the source custodian, version and purpose of public contract or payment reference. The transaction, source provenance and alleged departure from the authorised purpose define the matter. Protected source handling can be requested where disclosure creates a practical risk.

  2. Evidence of irregularity

    For evidence of irregularity, name the receiving scope and any outstanding acceptance. Explain a missing or disputed element instead of silently replacing it with an unrelated record.

  3. Source-protection needs

    For source-protection needs, provide the independently assessable finding or agreed alternative. State its conditions, expiry or material-change trigger; a favourable summary is not a substitute for the source.

Alternative evidence and a disputed source

Identify the missing element, its custodian and the alternative you can provide. Preserve conflicting versions and explain the difference. The receiving office states what it can establish and which question remains open.

Read the result before accepting its scope

An audit inquiry, reasoned finding, protected referral or documented closure.

Publish the appropriate finding and institutional response, preserving personal restrictions and the corrective follow-up.

Who can use this service

A person, civic organisation, supplier, public auditor or authorised representative reporting evidence of possible misuse of public funds. The independent audit route remains distinct from procurement evaluation.

Lead institution
Court of Public Audit
Receiving endpoint
Court of Public Audit
Service class
Governance & association
Result
An independent audit referral and protected reporting route.

The applicable safeguard

Prepare a request

The online workflow supports residents and authorized representatives, operators, researchers and public delegates. A saved receipt stays on this browser. The PDF packet provides a fillable offline record.

Timing, costs and review

The local register issues a receipt when the request is recorded. Published service clocks use receipt and verified-completeness events; numeric deadlines remain charter decisions in this fictional edition.

Any fee, exemption or numeric deadline must be published by the competent institution. This edition does not invent a currency or fee schedule.

Read the full procedure and exception routes →